Detroit Water and Sewerage Department
File #: 22-0911    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Request, Closed Session Status: Approved
In control: Office of the General Counsel
On agenda: 8/17/2022 Final action: 8/17/2022
Title: Upon the request of Chief General Counsel Debra N. Pospiech, Esq., the Board of Water Commissioners votes to approve a meeting with General Counsel in closed session pursuant to Sections 8(e) and (h) of the Michigan Open Meetings Act to discuss settlement strategy in pending litigation and a confidential attorney communication.
Indexes: Board of Water Commissioners
Title
Upon the request of Chief General Counsel Debra N. Pospiech, Esq., the Board of Water Commissioners votes to approve a meeting with General Counsel in closed session pursuant to Sections 8(e) and (h) of the Michigan Open Meetings Act to discuss settlement strategy in pending litigation and a confidential attorney communication.
Body
Agenda of August 17, 2022
Item No. 22-0911
Closed Session Request

TO: The Honorable
Board of Water Commissioners
City of Detroit, Michigan

FROM: Debra N. Pospiech, Esq., Chief General Counsel, Detroit Water and Sewerage Department

RE: Rembert v. City of Detroit
Wayne County Circuit Court Case No. 21-013669-CK


MOTION
Upon the request of Chief General Counsel Debra N. Pospiech, Esq., the Board of Water Commissioners for the City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD), by an affirmative roll call vote of 2/3 of the Board Members appointed and serving, hereby resolves to meet with General Counsel in closed session pursuant to Sections 8(e) and (h) of the Michigan Open Meetings Act to discuss settlement strategy for pending litigation entitled James and Juanita Rembert v. City of Detroit, et al. and related matters discussed in a confidential attorney communication.

BACKGROUND
Section 8(e) of the Michigan Open Meetings Act (MCL 15.261 et. seq.), allows a public body to meet in closed session: "To consult with its attorney regarding trial or settlement strategy in connection with specific pending litigation, but only if an open meeting would have a detrimental financial effect on the litigating or settlement position of the public body."
Section 8(h) also allows a public body to meet in closed session: "To consider material exempt from discussion or disclosure by state or federal statute." The Freedom of Information Act
(MCL 251.231 et. seq.) exempts from disclosure records subject to attorney-client privilege. (MCL 15.243(g))

Section 7 of the Open Meetings Act requires an affi...

Click here for full text